Legal Opinion

State v. Garceau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 18, 1967No. 5545PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The defendant’s contentions are that the Trial Court erred in not suppressing certain evidence obtained from a search of his person, in not granting a continuance during the course of the trial so defendant could change counsel, and in admitting and excluding evidence. We uphold the Trial Court and confirm the conviction.

According to the testimony of Janice Smith, who was a State’s witness, she, one Free, and Garceau had been engaged in the systematic passing of bad checks over a wide area including parts of Vermont, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, from July 25 to August 14 when they were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WhitneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. State v. BarkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. State v. RocheleauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. State v. BrodheadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. State v. SchofieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API