Legal Opinion
Doyle v. City of Roseville
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 26, 1993No. C7-93-710PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*35OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Marilyn Doyle appeals from summary judgment granted to the City of Roseville (city), claiming the city is not immune under Minn.Stat. § 466.03, subds. 4, 6, 6e (1990) from liability for her injuries resulting from a fall in a parking lot adjacent to a municipal ice arena. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
In February 1991, appellant Marilyn Doyle attended a hockey game at the Roseville Ice Arena (ice arena). Doyle did not pay to attend the event because she was invited as a special guest, but other patrons visiting the arena paid admission to attend. When Doyle…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doyle v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994