Legal Opinion

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 2, 1990PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sullivan, J.

Suing on, inter alia, a mistaken payment/money had and received cause of action, Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (MHT) seeks to recover from Chemical Bank the first of two redundant electronic wire transfer payments in the amount of $223,280.74 made by it on September 9, 1983 to Chemical.

The following account, which is gleaned basically from the parties’ stipulation of facts, is undisputed. On or about September 7, 1983, MHT received wire transfer instructions from one of its Saudi Arabian correspondent banks to transfer $223,280.74 to Chemical for credit…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Parsa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Peters Griffin Woodward, Inc. v. WCSC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Byxbie v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Allied Investment Corp. v. JasenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Choi v. Tower Research Capital LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  4. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  5. Republic of Haiti v. DuvalierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API