Legal Opinion
Connelly v. United States Dist. Court in and for the Southern Dist. Of California, Central Division
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1951No. 13053_1PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Petitioner seeks our writ of prohibition1 forbidding the respondent judge to act on petitioner’s motion to reduce petitioner’s bail, theretofore fixed at $75,000.00 by the respondent judge, for his release pending his trial under an indictment filed in respondent’s District Court for the Southern District of California.
The indictment charged, inter alia, that petitioner and some eleven other persons conspired to commit the offense against the United States of:
“ * * * unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly to organize and help organize as the Communist Party of the United…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Eisler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Burton S. Knapp v. John P. KinseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- 47 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1409, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,260 Madison Anderson v. Walter Sheppard, Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- William J. Green, Jr. v. Honorable John W. Murphy, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.