Legal Opinion

Mobil Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 22, 2005No. 03-1508TPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Senior Judge.

The matter under consideration is defendant’s January 21, 2004 motion to dismiss portions of plaintiff Mobil Corporation’s1 first amended complaint for a refund of its 1997 taxes. The government (through the *710Internal Revenue Service) alleges that certain claims2 set forth in plaintiffs first amended complaint for a refund of its 1997 taxes, filed on December 9, 2003, are not justiciable because they are untimely. Specifically, defendant avers that plaintiff failed to file with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) within the period of limitations prescribed for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Newton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Pennoni v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Blue v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Cadrecha v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API