Eclectic Properties East, LLC v. Marcus & Millichap Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether Plaintiffs-Appellants have pleaded facts sufficient under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 9(b) to support a plausible theory of Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and RICO conspiracy *994violations against Defendants-Appellees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we hold that Plaintiffs’ complaint does not meet the pleading standards required by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by290 opinions
- Boris Levitt v. Yelp! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Brian Whitaker v. Tesla Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- P. Victor Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
285 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.