Legal Opinion
State v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 27, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0488PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal presents the question whether the State of Arizona (“State”) may sue the Arizona Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund (“Fund”) when the Fund refuses to pay a claim after the State’s insurer has become insolvent. We conclude that it may.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 In 1983, the Arizona Department of Transportation (“ADOT”) entered a contract with Ball, Ball & Brossamer (“BB & B”), a California corporation, for highway construction. As required by the contract, BB & B obtained a liability insurance policy naming the State and ADOT as insureds. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & HandicappedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- In Re Estate of KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Arizona Department of Administration v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Arizona Department of Adminstration v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. AZ. PROPERTY & CAS. INS.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.