Legal Opinion
Crossroads Cogeneration Corporation v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 27, 1998No. 97-5470PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from the dismissal of all counts of a complaint filed by Crossroads Cogeneration Corporation (“Crossroads”) against Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (“0 & R”). The district court dismissed Crossroads’ breach of contract claim and related claims on the ground that they were barred by issue and claim preclusion, and dismissed Crossroads’ antitrust claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We will reverse in part and affirm in part.
I
Crossroads, a Delaware company, is an independent producer of electric…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Toledo MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Versata Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Kurt Froebel v. George E. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.