In Re Champion Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The demurrer was sustained on the ground that the facts alleged do not constitute a preference under C. S., 218 (c) (14). Lamb v. Hood, Comr., 205 N. C., 409, 171 S. E., 359. But this is not all the petition alleges. It undoubtedly states a valid claim of commonalty, if not one of preference. Trust Co. v. Hood, Comr., 206 N. C., 268, 173 S. E., 601; Flack v. Hood, Comr., 204 N. C., 337, 168 S. E., 520.
A demurrer goes to the heart of a pleading and challenges the right of the pleader to maintain his position in any view of the matter, admitting for the purpose the truth of the allegations of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Flack v. . Hood, Comr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Meyer v. Fenner & BeaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Ellis v. . PerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Bowling v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Odom v. . PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Nall v. . McConnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Stroud v. Southern Oil Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938