Legal Opinion

Doe v. Baum

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 5, 2017No. Case Number 16-13174PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND RENEWED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTIONS FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge

Plaintiff John Doe alleges in an amended complaint that he agreed under duress to withdraw from the University of Michigan with only one semester left to complete his degree, after he was found to *791have violated the school’s Policy on Sexual Misconduct by Students. An appeal board assembled by the University’s Office of Student Conflict Resolution (OSCR) determined that Doe had…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doe v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Doe v. University of Colorado, Boulder ex rel. Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
  3. Z.J. v. Vanderbilt Univ.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  4. Doe v. University of St. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  5. Rolph v. Hobart & William Smith CollegesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API