Legal Opinion

Doe v. University of Colorado, Boulder ex rel. Board of Regents

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided May 26, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16-cv-1789-WJM-KLMPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

William J. Martinez, United States District Judge ■

Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (“Title IX”), declares that “[n]o person in the United States shall, on-the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected .to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance,” 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a). Federal agencies “empowered to extend Federal financial assistance to any education program or activity” may promulgate regulations to enforce this prohibition, and may…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Doe v. University of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. John Doe v. Columbia Coll. Chi.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. John Doe v. Marymount Univ.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
  4. Z.J. v. Vanderbilt Univ.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  5. Rossley v. Drake Univ.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API