Legal Opinion

State v. Truax

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1924No. 17939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bonald, J., entered February 7, 1923, upon sustaining a demurrer to the indictment, dismissing a prosecution for grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

Perry B. Truax and the Seattle National Bank, a corporation organized under the Federal banking act, were, by indictment, charged with the crime of grand larceny, alleged to have been committed by trick and device, in that they refused to surrender to Frank Waterhouse & Company, a corporation, certain collateral after a note owing to the bank by that company had been paid which the collateral was given to secure. The demurrer of the bank to the indictment was sustained by the trial court and a judgment of dismissal was entered as to it, from which the state appealed.

*70The question presented is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Union Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Matter of EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. United States v. Van SchaickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
  4. State v. BurgessWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. DeerWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Canadian Fur Trappers Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. State ex rel. Kropf v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Pueblo v. West India Oil Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
  4. State v. GosslerOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Matter of McMahon v. DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API