Legal Opinion

United States v. Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C., Trust Group

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 6, 2000No. CIV.A. 98-1759 SSHPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are (1) plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), or in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, defendant’s opposition thereto, and plaintiffs’ reply; and (2) defendant’s motion for stay of proceedings under certain circumstances. Because the Court considers affidavits outside of the pleadings, the Court treats plaintiffs’ motion as a motion for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c).

Summary judgment may be granted only “if the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Summers v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CouseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Bogicevic v. Seabourn Cruise Line LimitedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  3. Mullen Technologies, Inc. v. Qiantu Motor (Suzhou) Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
  4. Mullis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API