Legal Opinion
Mullen Technologies, Inc. v. Qiantu Motor (Suzhou) Ltd.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 1, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01979Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MULLEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Case No.: 3:19-CV-1979 W (AHG) California corporation, 12 ORDER: Plaintiff, 13 (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO COMPEL 14 ARBITRATION AND STAY THIS QIANTU MOTOR (SUZHOU) LTD., 15 ACTION PENDING CONCLUSION OF a limited liability company, THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDING 16 Defendant. [DOC. 5]; AND 17 (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 18 SANCTIONS [DOC. 13] 19 20 Pending before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendant 21 Qiantu Motor (Suzhou)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Delaware Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. v. Rosseel, N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.