Legal Opinion
Bogicevic v. Seabourn Cruise Line Limited
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 18, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01573Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 NIKOLA BOGICEVIC, CASE NO. C21-1573JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 12 COMPEL ARBITRATION SEABOURN CRUISE LINE 13 LIMITED, 14 Defendant. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendant Seabourn Cruise Line Limited’s (“Seabourn”) 17 motion to compel arbitration. (Mot. (Dkt. # 4); Reply (Dkt. # 9).1) Plaintiff Nikola 18 Bogicevic opposes Seabourn’s motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 7).) The court has considered the 19 motion, all submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lozano v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ge Energy Power Conversion Fr. Sas, Corp. v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Rizalyn Bautista v. Star CruisesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.