Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 30, 1949No. 8768PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, District Judge.

This case involves the question of whether or not the beneficiary under a life insurance policy is precluded from a recovery by reason of misrepresentations made by the insured in his application, and the giving of a false certificate of continued good health upon the receipt of the policy.

After a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, defendant has moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and in the alternative for a new trial pursuant and in conformity to the provisions of Rule 50(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A. The plaintiff contends that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. White v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  5. Pierre v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Sentry Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Cohen v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. The National Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Verda A. GoreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Washington National Insurance v. ReginatoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1966
  5. Frances Leon Parrish v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API