Legal Opinion

Cole v. Kobs & Draft Advertising, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 9, 1996No. 93 Civ. 3239 (SWK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

In this action for fraudulent inducement, defendant Kobs & Draft Advertising, Inc. (“Kobs”) moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. For the reasons outlined below, Kobs’s motion is denied.

BACKGROUND 1

Kobs is a company in the business of direct market advertising, which involves communicating with the general public for the purpose of eliciting consumer responses. In June 1991, Kobs hired plaintiff Patricia Cole (“Cole”) to work in its New York City office as an account supervisor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. William Rothenberg v. Lincoln Farm Camp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Ingle v. Glamore Motor Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Optimal U.S. LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Lam v. American Express Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API