Legal Opinion

Dolcefino v. Ray

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 3, 1995No. 01-95-00453-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Relator, a journalist, seeks a writ of mandamus relieving him from the trial court’s order to answer questions about information given to him by Mr. Perry. The real party in interest, Sylvester Turner, has sued Dolee-fino for slander. Although Mr. Perry gave the information in confidence, Mr. Turner discovered Mr. Perry’s identity through his own investigation, without any disclosure by Dolcefino and without any compulsion by the respondent, Judge Ray. Mr. Perry has already been deposed and has testified about what he did and did not tell Mr. Dolcefino. Mr. Perry is not a journalist,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re Bruce SelcraigCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Channel Two Television Co. v. Dickerson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dolcefino v. Turner, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Nelson v. PaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. In Re Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. De La Paz v. Henry's Diner, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
  5. Barbouti v. Hearst Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API