Legal Opinion
Kuns v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 21, 2013No. Case No. 3:11 CV 1540PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Ford Motor Company’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22.), which the Court grants, and Ms. Kuns’ motion to amend the complaint to cure jurisdictional defects (Doc. 32), which the Court also grants.
Ms. Kuns purchased a new 2010 Mercury Mariner from a Ford dealer in Vermillion, Ohio. The following winter, when a family member closed the rear liftgate, the glass in it shattered. Ms. Kuns had the rear glass replaced at an independent automotive glass installer shortly thereafter, having her insurance pay for the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heather Floyd v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Risner v. Regal Marine Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Nguyen v. WheelerDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025
- Sifuentes v. Christian Brothers AutomotiveDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022
- Springhill Avenue United Methodist Church, Inc. v. Lloyd's of LondonDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.