Legal Opinion

Bobby v. State of Alaska

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided February 14, 1989No. A84-544 CivilPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

HOLLAND, Chief Judge.

This case raises important questions of first impression for the court with respect to the validity of regulations promulgated by the Alaska Board of Game for the implementation of subsistence hunting rights which are protected by federal law.

BACKGROUND

In 1973, Congress began considering what ultimately became the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANIL-CA). ANILCA became law on December 2, 1980, as Pub.L. No. 96-487, 94 Stat. 2371, 16 U.S.C. §§ 3101-3233. 1 Title VIII of AN-ILCA pertains to the “subsistence way of life”, making…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 20, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,029 Wesley P. Bernard v. Gulf Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Madison v. Alaska Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. American Tunaboat Association, a Nonprofit Cooperative Association v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Katie John v. Alaska Fish and Wildlife FedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. George J. Alexander, United States of America v. Henry W. PeeleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Totemoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API