Legal Opinion

Katie John v. Alaska Fish and Wildlife Fed

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 2013No. 09-36122, 09-36125, 09-36127PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals concern the 1999 Final Rules (“1999 Rules”) promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture (“Secretaries”) to implement part of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (“ANILCA”). 1 The 1999 Rules identify which navigable waters within Alaska constitute “public lands” under Title VIII of ANILCA, which provides a priority to rural Alaska residents for subsistence hunting and fishing on such lands. Plaintiffs-Appellants Katie John, et al., argue that the 1999 Rules sweep too narrowly, in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sturgeon v. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. John Sturgeon v. Sue MasicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Baley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  4. John Sturgeon v. Sue MasicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Eric Wannamaker v. Richard v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API