Legal Opinion

Trans-Canada Enterprises, Ltd. v. King County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 11, 1981No. 8318-0-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Case

This is an appeal by King and Pierce Counties, and certain officials of those counties, from a judgment mandating that a broken dike on the White River be repaired.

The controversy between the parties in this mandamus action and the trial court's resolution of it are well set out in the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court following a trial. They are as follows:

Findings of Fact

The Court has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter herein.

Finding of fact No. 1.

The plaintiff, Trans-Canada Enterprises, Ltd., owns a substantial piece of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Conger v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HallWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API