Legal Opinion
Wilbert v. Day
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1915No. 12081PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered March 10, 1914, by default, after denying a motion to quash a service of summons.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
The only question upon this appeal is the sufficiency of the service of the summons upon the defendant, L. F. Connolly, to give the court jurisdiction of the person of the defendant. The service was made by the sheriff of Spokane county where the action was pending. Omitting the formal parts of the sheriff’s return, it is as follows:
“I served the within summons and complaint upon the within named defendant, L. F. Connolly in the county of Spokane, State of Washington, on the 6th day of December, 1913, by then and there delivering to, and leaving with Mrs. L. F. Connolly, at the dwelling…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bond v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Krutz v. IsaacsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Mitchell, Lewis & Staver Co. v. O'NeilWashington Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. GooleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Nuttallburg Smokeless Fuel Co. v. First National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
- Lepeska v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Sheldon v. FettigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Hanna v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1929