Legal Opinion

Soule v. West

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 26, 1934No. 33155PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

The relators, three in number, are plaintiffs in a suit filed in the Second judicial district court in and for the parish of Claiborne. The suit is petitory in character, and involves title to an undivided one-half interest in ninety-one acres of valuable oil land situated in Claiborne parish.

The defendants, also three in number, after they were served with citations and copies of the petition, and before excepting or pleading to the merits of the suit, ruled plaintiffs into court to show cause why defendants should not obtain permission of the court to take the testimony of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Interstate Rice Milling Co. v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Union Iron & Foundry Co. v. SonnefieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. State Ex Rel. Batt v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Canada v. Frost Lumber IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Commercial Nat. Bank v. HendersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Harrelson v. New Orleans-Roosevelt CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Arnold v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API