Legal Opinion

Santa Clara Savings & Loan Assn. v. Pereira

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 1985No. Civ. 54451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Introduction:

This case raises the narrow question of whether a lender may enforce a due-on-sale clause contained in the provisions of a deed of trust (executed in 1979), when the party who purchases the real property from the trustor refused to provide the lender with credit information. We affirm the trial court’s judgment that in such circumstances the lender may accelerate the obligation due under the loan.

Background:

The facts are not in dispute. On August 30, 1979, Joseph and Kay Orlando (hereafter trustors) executed a promissory note for $105,000 in favor of Santa…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Taormina Theosophical Community, Inc. v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Dawn Investment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Wilhite v. CallihanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hart v. Clear Recon Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Bruntz v. AlfaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Bidasha v. Novastar CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Hart v. Clear Recon Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. MCA TELEVISION Ltd. v. American CommunicationsCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API