Legal Opinion

Mechanics & Traders Insurance v. Himmelstein

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This cause is a proceeding in error to the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county from a judgment in favor of Bert Himmelstein and Albert Himmelstein, d. b. a. Carnegie Motor Service, plaintiffs below, against the Mechanics’ & Traders’ Insurance Company, defendant below, in the sum of $1,700, on a policy of fire insurance covering certain automobiles partially destroyed by lightning at Lorain in the disaster of June 28, 1924, and it is sought to reverse the judgment on the ground that it is clearly and manifestly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law.

The main contention is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Taylor v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  3. Whitehouse v. BolsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
  4. Kenton Ins. v. WiggintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  5. Bartley v. National Business Men's Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Poch v. Equit. L. Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Poch v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Laundreville v. MeroMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Smith v. Seven-Eleven, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Pateras v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API