Legal Opinion

State v. Tomal

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1997No. 64420-9PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— The question before us is whether a criminal defendant’s appeal may be dismissed without a showing that the defendant has waived his right to appeal based on the defense attorney’s failure to timely pursue the ap*987peal. We hold the State has the burden of demonstrating that the Defendant waived his or her right to appeal in order to dismiss a direct appeal. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand to the superior court to determine whether the Defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally abandoned his right to appeal.

FACTS

On June 20, 1989, Tommy Tomal was found guilty in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. HeadWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. RafayWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State v. KellsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. TomalWashington Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API