Legal Opinion

State v. Tomal

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1997No. 64420-9PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

948 P.2d 833 (1997)

133 Wash.2d 985

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Tommy TOMAL, Petitioner.

No. 64420-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 20, 1997.

Decided December 24, 1997.

Timothy Coogan, Tacoma, for Petitioner.

John Ladenburg, Pierce County Prosecutor, Donna Masumoato, Deputy County Prosecutor, Tacoma, for Respondent.

GUY, Justice.

The question before us is whether a criminal defendant's appeal may be dismissed without a showing that the defendant has waived his right to appeal based on the defense attorney's failure to timely pursue the appeal. We hold the State has the burden…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. HeadWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. RafayWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State v. KellsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. KellsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API