Legal Opinion

Major v. City of Hartsville

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 6, 2012No. 4979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFew, C.J.

This appeal involves constructive notice under subsection 15-78-60(15) of the South Carolina Code (2005), a provision of the Tort Claims Act. The question before the court is “constructive notice of what?” More precisely stated, the issue we address is: What is the “defect or condition” of which a plaintiff must prove a governmental entity had constructive notice before the entity is subject to liability “for loss arising out of a defect or a condition in [or] on ... a highway, road, street, ... or other public way caused by a third party?” § 15-78-60(15). Alberta Major presented evidence the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Henderson v. St. Francis Community HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Pinckney v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Giannini v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Major v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API