Bourgois v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Gil Bourgois appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his complaint against Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. (MDU). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
In an appeal from an order granting summary judgment, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party who opposed the motion and give that party the benefit of all favorable inferences which reasonably can be drawn from the evidence. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Asbridge, 414 N.W.2d 596, 598 (N.D.1987). Our recitation of facts reflects that principle.
Bourgois was hired by MDU…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Moore v. Kluthe & Lane Ins. Agency, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Dewey v. LetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Glover v. Jackson State UniversityMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Brass Metal Products, Inc. v. E-J Enterprises Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Matter of Estate of LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Heart River Partners v. GoetzfriedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.