Legal Opinion

Chowhan v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 2007No. A07A0579PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

In this suit for specific performance of a real estate contract, Ayesha Chowhan appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Phillip and Laura Miller, arguing that issues of fact remain as to whether the Millers’ conduct waived the necessity of a timely tender of an earnest payment. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c); Britt v. Kelly & Picerne, Inc. “A de novo standard of review applies to an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deep Six, Inc. v. AbernathyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Woody's Steaks, LLC v. PastoriaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Britt v. Kelly & Picerne, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Kaesemeyer v. Angiogenix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Benedict v. SneadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simpson v. PendergastCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Highwoods Realty Ltd. Partnership v. Community Loans of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Johnson v. UNIFIED RESIDENTIAL DEV. CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. DONROB INVESTMENTS, L. P. v. 360 RESIDENTIAL, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
  5. Rowland v. Scarborough Farms, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API