Rowland v. Scarborough Farms, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
In this suit for breach of contract arising from an oral agreement for the sale of a horse, Joel B. Rowland d/b/a J & B Farms (“Rowland”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Scarborough Farms, LLC (“Scarborough”), arguing that issues of fact remain as to whether payment was timely and whether Scarborough was entitled to cancel the contract. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo standard of review applies to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hip Pocket, Inc. v. LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Henry v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Key v. BagenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Turner v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.