Federal Deposit Insurance Ex Rel. FSLIC Resolution Fund v. Israel
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
KELLER, District Judge.
Cross-claim defendant Touche Ross & Co. moves to dismiss the cross-complaint for indemnification. One of the grounds asserted in the motion is that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the claims. Other third-party cross-claim defendants have joined in the motion to dismiss. On February 28, 1990, this Court issued an order for further briefing on the impact of FIRREA, 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2), upon the jurisdiction of the Court over third-party claims. Because proper jurisdiction is a prerequisite to the Court’s adjudication…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HowseDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. MackieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Ryan v. CosentinoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.