Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Temporary Compensation Review Board

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 27, 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the Temporary Compensation Review Board (the -Board) improperly lowered the appellant-employees’ position classifications which had been assigned to them under the Hay Plan, so-called, on the ground that the Board either exceeded its jurisdiction, or, if it acted within its powers, it did so in violation of the appellants’ due process rights. Having carefully considered their arguments, we deny the employees’ appeal and affirm the Superior Court judgment.

1. Legislative history

Expressly finding a dramatic need “for a redesigned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Whitely v. New Mexico State Personnel BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Anderson v. Colorado State Department of PersonnelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Cook v. Lisbon School CommitteeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Struck v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Gonzales v. Commissioner, Department of Public SafetySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API