Legal Opinion

State v. Yount

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 27, 2008No. 20060901-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

11 Defendant Nathaniel Thomas Yount appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained through a subpoena and subpoena duces tecum served on his medical provider. Defendant asserts that the trial court correctly determined that the State's failure to give him notice of the subpoena rendered it an unreasonable search and seizure of his medical records. Defendant claims, however, that the trial court erred in concluding that the inevitable discovery doctrine alleviated the need to suppress the evidence. The State argues that no unreasonable search…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. LaroccoUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Craig Lawrence ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. State v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. TopanotesUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Burns v. BoydenUtah Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Staley v. NORTHERN UTAH HEALTHCAREUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. HoffmannCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. State v. LEGRANDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API