Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1991No. 880181PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON CERTIORARI TO THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Utah Court of Appeals in State v. Thompson, 751 P.2d 805 (Utah Ct.App.1988), on the propriety of the admission of evidence against defendants which had been gathered pursuant to the Subpoena Powers Act.

Defendants Michael C. Thompson and Bruce A. Conklin were convicted after a jury trial of five counts of bribery in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-508(l)(b), one count of antitrust violation under Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-10-914 and 76-10-920, *416and one count of racketeering…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Alta Industries, Ltd. v. HurstUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API