Young v. Stevenson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court. Styles T. Rowe, Judge. It was error to admit testimony to explain the terms of the notes of Stevenson and Munder or the judgment rendered against them. 25 Ark. 606; 26 Ark. 231; 2 Black, Judg. § § 625, 626; 11 Fed. 657; Bates, Partnership, § 453a. The discharge granted to' Stevenson and Munder did not release the former from his personal debts.' Bump, Bankr. 66, 67; 3 Am. Bank.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court. Styles T. Rowe, Judge. It was error to admit testimony to explain the terms of the notes of Stevenson and Munder or the judgment rendered against them. 25 Ark. 606; 26 Ark. 231; 2 Black, Judg. § § 625, 626; 11 Fed. 657; Bates, Partnership, § 453a. The discharge granted to' Stevenson and Munder did not release the former from his personal debts.' Bump, Bankr. 66, 67; 3 Am. Bank. R. 1, 91, 66. The judgment was covered by the discharge in bankruptcy. 74 S. W. 249; 30 U. S. § 15, p. 550. The discharge is conclusive, and cannot be collaterally attacked. Black…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCueeoch, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment quashing a writ of execution sued out by appellant against appellee on a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace and after-wards filed in the circuit court. The judgment was against appellee Stevenson and Munder upon notes executed to appellant and signed individually by each, and upon an account for money paid by appellant for appellee and Munder.
Subsequent to the rendition of this judgment, appellee and Munder, as partners, and Munder, individually, filed their petition in bankruptcy in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Farwell v. HustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- In re RhutasselDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
- Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. v. Byers & EggersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Corey v. RipleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- H. D. Williams Cooperage Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Dowell v. SchislerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Andrus v. CornwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Bloyd v. Williams-Echols Dry Goods CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925