Bloyd v. Williams-Echols Dry Goods Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
The appellant and one C. A. Wilson were the only members of a firm or partnership doing a mercantile business at Addielee, Oklahoma, under the firm name and style of Valley Trading Company. The appellee instituted this action against the appellant and Wilson, alleging that they Were indebted to it in the sum of $1,418.70 on an open account for merchandise, and that appellant and Wilson were'indebted to appellee in.other sums which were duly asigned to the appellee, amounting in the aggregate to $3,029.07; that appellant had made fraudulent conveyances of lands in Washington County to defraud…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Horner v. HamnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
- Armstrong v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Wm. R. Moore Dry Goods Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- First Nat. Bank of Herkimer v. Poland UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940