Legal Opinion

William Tackaberry & Co. v. Gilmore & Ruhl

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1899No. 8605PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Dakota county. Tried below before Norris, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

On November 22, 1892, Joseph Smith, a retail merchant of Dakota county, made and delivered to Gilmore & Ruhl a chattel mortgage.on his entire stock of merchandise to secure an antecedent indebtedness amounting to $1,150. Afterwards, on the same day, he executed other mortgages covering the same property, one being ■to the Homer State Bank to secure a claim of $100, one to Arthur Sherlock for $250, and one to S. A. Combs for $275. On the following day another mortgage was given by Smith to H. A. Jandt to secure a pre-existing indebtedness amounting to $1,525. These several mortgages were filed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sherwin v. GaghagenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Kay v. NollNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Jones v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Grand Island Banking Co. v. CostelloNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kilpatrick-Koch Dry Goods Co. v. McPheelyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of McCook v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. First National Bank of McCook v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API