Legal Opinion

Harrell v. City of Lewiston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1973No. 11031Published

1Opinion of the Court

506 P.2d 470 (1973)

95 Idaho 243

James R. HARRELL et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

CITY OF LEWISTON, a municipal corp. et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 11031.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

February 14, 1973.

Michael C. Moore, D.K. Worden, Lewiston, for defendants-appellants.

William v. McCann, Jr., Merlyn W. Clark, Lewiston, for plaintiffs-respondents.

McFADDEN, Justice.

This action for writ of mandate was instituted by James R. Harrell and Loretta M. Harrell, husband and wife, and Albert A. Broughton and Connie L. Broughton, husband and wife (referred to herein as respondents). By their complaint, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. City of Hutchins v. PrasifkaTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Heidorn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API