Legal Opinion

Scarritt-Comstock Furniture Co. v. Hudspeth

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from the District Court of Canadian County.; before Clinton F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

One George B. Barron, as the traveling salesman for the Scaritt-Comstock Furniture Company, sold a bill of goods to Joseph C. Hudspeth amounting in all to six hundred and forty-five dollars and eighty-seven cents, consisting of chairs, center tables, dressers, bedsteads, mattresses, and other household furniture. The bill of goods was sold from price lists and catalogue which showed pictures or cuts of the articles ordered. When the goods were received it was found that the wholesale house had made certain substitutes where the patterns ordered were out of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Higgins v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Diversy v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. McKindly v. DunhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Clark v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Butler v. DormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bullard v. CaulkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API