Legal Opinion

Respro, Inc. v. Worcester Backing Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 15, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff, a Rhode Island corporation,

claims to be the owner of certain letters patent of the United States, of which the chief is a process patent for making impregnated napped woven fabric material, used as a leather substitute. On March 31, 1933, the plaintiff granted the defendant a license to manufacture under the patents, and the defendant associated with it in the manufacture another corporation called Elfskin Corporation. A controversy between the parties was ended by a written agreement dated June 15, 1934, and executed by the plaintiff as the party of the first part, and by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Lowell Gas Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Morin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. New England Overall Co. Inc. v. WoltmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Eno v. Prime Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API