Fabiano v. Fabiano
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue of this appeal is whether the trial court erred by declining to modify the defendant’s child support obligation to the plaintiff, where the defendant’s assets had increased substantially as a result of a personal injury award. The plaintiff appeals, claiming that the court abused its discretion by failing to find that the increase in the defendant’s assets constituted a substantial change in circumstances warranting a modification. We find error.
The marriage of the parties was dissolved in February, 1978. They have two children, now ages thirteen and eleven. At the time of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Friedlander v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Albert Mendel & Son, Inc. v. KroghConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Sweeny v. SweenyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Howat v. HowatConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- O'Bymachow v. O'BymachowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Fisher v. FisherConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Schofield v. SchofieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Gleason v. GleasonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.