Legal Opinion

Sandoval v. M1 Auto Collisions Centers

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 9, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-03230-EDLPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO DISQUALIFY

Re: Dkt. Nos. 75, 96, 100

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge

On April 28, 2015, Plaintiffs moved for class certification and appointment of class counsel. On June 2, 2015, Defendants moved to dismiss and to disqualify class counsel and Plaintiff Ramirez as class representative. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Defendants’ motions are DENIED.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendants are Ml Collision Care…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Lubin v. Wackenhut Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Armida Ruelas, et al. v. County of Alameda, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  4. Iron Workers Local No. 25 Pension Fund v. Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Moore v. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API