Legal Opinion
Neal v. Greenfields Irrigation District
District Court, D. Montana
Decided June 3, 2024No. 4:21-cv-00106Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION LLOYD and DANIELLE NEAL, JAMES P. TROY, and DAVID M. SABATO and Cause No. CV-21-106-GF-BMM MITZI B. SABATO as trustees of SABATO DAVID M AND SABATO MITZI B 2017 REVOCABLE TRUST, ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. GREENFIELDS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, FORT SHAW IRRIGATION DISTRICT, UNITED STATES, and DOES A-E, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Defendant Greenfields Irrigation District (“Greenfields”) has filed a motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff James P. Troy’s (“Troy”) claims based upon the doctrine of laches. (Doc. 83.)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Mason & Dixon Intermodal v. Lapmaster International LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Riley v. BlackerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.