Legal Opinion
State v. Boylan
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 12, 1995PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
David Boylan appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) for operating a motor vehicle with excessive blood-alcohol in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B.l.B. (Pamph.1994). 1 On appeal Boylan contends that the State lacked probable cause to arrest him and urges that prose-cutorial misconduct during closing argument denied him a fair trial. We affirm the judgment.
In the early morning hours of April 3, 1993, an Orono police officer stopped the vehicle operated by Boylan after watching him leave a downtown…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ParkinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- State v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. EnggassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- State v. PineauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richards v. Town of EliotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- State v. CilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- State v. ForsythSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. BolducSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- State v. SwettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.