Legal Opinion

State v. Bolduc

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 3, 1998PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] The State appeals pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A (1980 & Supp.1997) from an order entered in the District Court (Au gusta, Beliveau, J.) suppressing evidence that Mark Bolduc operated a vehicle under the influence of intoxicants in violation of 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411 (1996). 1 Because there were articulable facts which warranted the investigatory stop and there was probable cause to require that Bolduc take a blood-alcohol test, we vacate the order.

[¶ 2] On September 26, 1997, at approximately 10:00 p.m., Deputy Sheriff Eric Test-erman of the Kennebec County Sheriffs Department…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. State v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. State v. CilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. State v. BoylanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State of Maine v. John E. SassoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  3. State v. ForsythSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  4. State v. MenardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. State of Maine v. Nicholas P. LovejoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API