Legal Opinion

State v. Pineau

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 5, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

The determinative issue in this case focuses upon the limits of rebuttal argument to the jury permitted a prosecutor.

The Defendant, John Pineau, was convicted of operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B, following a jury trial in Superior Court, Penobscot County. Challenging his conviction, he raises four issues on appeal. We consider only one of those issues, and we sustain his appeal.

At the very end of his rebuttal the prosecutor proposed to the jury the following hypothesis:

Let’s just for a moment suggest to you this, let’s say that there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ReillySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. State v. WymanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. State v. MartelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HindsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. State v. HebertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. State v. BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. State v. WeisbrodeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. State v. WinslowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API