Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Dried Fruit Co. v. Sheriffs

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1916No. Civ. No. 1411PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered and entered -against it and in favor of the defendants. The action is for the recovery of the sum of $1,887.12, alleged to be the balance due from the defendants to' the plaintiff on a contract of sale made and entered into between the parties on the twenty-ninth day of September, 1913, whereby, it is alleged, the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendants 132,878 pounds of dried prunes, at the agreed price of one hundred dollars per ton for the first ten tons thereof and $120 per ton for the balance thereof.

The undisputed facts are: That one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Clark v. Tulare Lake Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. County of Sonoma v. StofenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dierks v. NewsomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Whitaker v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Cowan v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Worthington v. Peoples State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Halloran v. IsaacsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API