Legal Opinion

Killhonic v. Nuss

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1900No. 1239PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Missoula County; Frank IE Woody, Judge. Action by Elmer Killhonic against Charles A. Nuss and another. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

— This appeal is from a judgment entered on the 12th day of February, 1898. The cause was on the 28th day of May, 1900, set for argument today, and the parties were duly notified by the clerk of the setting. The appellants have neither filed a brief nor made any argument. All they have done in this court is to lodge the transcript with the clerk. It is incumbent upon the appellants to point out in the manner provided by the rules of practice, the errors upon which they rely for a reversal; the failure so to do will operate as an abandonment of the appeal, and require the aifirmance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte BurrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Brewster v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Adams v. Bankers' Life Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State v. DakinMontana Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mendenhall v. LyonMontana Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API